smicker wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:30:10 +0100, Benedict White
wrote:

smicker wrote:

Thanks. I have now learned that from other posters on here and
although I was wrong, it was the procedure required by the local CC
before they changed their minds. The advice here is now making this ng
by far better than the old ng and I am grateful to those here who
answer questions.

The only caveat to that is that as the witness statement was filed after
witness statements were exchanged you did need to make an application to
get the witness statement in. The statement itself as others have said
does not need a stamp.

You did get a copy of the order saying that the statement could be
allowed in?

Yes I put it in with a N244 application and I have received
notification from the court that one has gone through ex-parte. I am
now awaiting a decision on a second statement and exhibits that were
necessary because of the line the other side took in their rebuttal
thanks Benedict.


No problem.




--
Kind regards



Benedict White

I am not a lawyer.

Please note that my email address is not checked regularly and will
be used for harvesting UCE. If you want to email me work out my address
from the following, my first name at law 4 free daht org daht uk.
If this cause accessibility problems to those who are blind etc., please
post a follow up, and I will try and improve the situation.