View Single Post
  #28  
Old August 17th 07, 10:40 AM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Mark Goodge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,940
Default Warranty claim rejected due to "Liquid Damage" exclusion

Peter Parry wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:40:04 +0100, Mark Goodge
wrote:


The seller is claiming to have objective evidence of liquid within the
phone, but the seller has not yet provided that evidence to anyone
else. Until they do, the buyer is perfectly entitled to continue to
press his claim for a repair or replacement.


The evidence has been offered to the buyer. When he pays the sellers
fee for shipping and inspecting the phone (£17.50) he can have it
back.


Or he could exercise his rights under the SoGA and force the supplier to
defend his claim at their own expense.

Mark
--
http://mark.goodge.co.uk

 

Personal Injury Attorney Los Angeles - Mortgage Calculator - Credit Cards - McDonalds - 9 of Cups