steve robinson ] said:
Yellow wrote:

Mark Goodge ] said:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:30:12 +0100, Les Invalides put finger to
keyboard and typed:

What if the dweller is a leaseholder and the person wishing entry
the freeholder? Does it still apply that the freeholder should
assume he can waltz in whenever he likes? If not, why not? What
is different in principle?

It's different in principle because it's different in law. A
leaseholder has an entirely different set of rights to a tenant.

So you are saying the tenant's rights do not not include a ban on the
landlord et all entering his home with out prior agreement (excluding
emergencies of course)?

I think you need to cite some law at this point.

from what the op has said here and other groups , they reported taps
leaking , from the landlords POV this could warrant the argument that
it was an emergency

Hardly. Unless the water had needed to be turned off.