"Palindrome" wrote in message

If he knew that he hadn't been speeding, then he would have been confident
of the outcome. Why would anyone who had not been speeding admit to have
done so?

I didn't know I had been speeding, or even if it was my vehicle. Thats why I
asked for further information. They refused to send it. I didn't want to say
it was definitely me until I knew it was definitely me.

Oh, knowing that you were guilty of speeding but hoping that they had
caught someone else instead, or hoping that there was something wrong with
the evidence, is fair enough. But it is hardly "perverting the course of
justice" to have got off with an offence that you actually did..

It seems reasonable to me to ask for further information before accepting
guilt for an offence, particularly if the alleged offender cant remember
having committed it.