Steve Walker wrote:

Sam Nelson wrote:
In article ,
says...
steve robinson wrote:
Bazzer Smith wrote:

Time to forget all this glorifying war lark and move on I think.
Waste of time and money too.

Its not about glorifying war its about remembering the dead and
injured sent into battle because of the shameful failure of our
political leaders

Well said, Steve

That's right. You Steves all stick together and save us from the
nasty troll.

Damn right - it's the Trinity of the Steve. Wait till one more arrives
and we morph into a fighting robot.

.


What is a collective noun for Steves?

--
Facts are sacred ... but comment is free

"Bazzer Smith" wrote

Time to forget all this glorifying war lark and move on I think.

Ironic that the symbol is the poppy when you think about the effect that
ousting the Taliban has had on opium production and distribution in the last
few years.

Nice troll, Baz, but a little late (or early?) for the wdaukmtc.

"Anthony R. Gold" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:10:25 GMT, "steve robinson"
wrote:

Bazzer Smith wrote:

Time to forget all this glorifying war lark and move on I think.
Waste of time and money too.

Its not about glorifying war its about remembering the dead and injured
sent into battle because of the shameful failure of our political leaders

You truly believe the more honourable things to have done in 1939 with
respect the attack on Poland and in 2001 with respect to the attack on the
USA would have been to ignore our mutual defence treaty obligations and
not
to join in waging wars against Germany and Afghanistan respectively?

There was nothing honourable in the attack on Afghanistan or the attack on
Iraq, you psychopathic tit.

Anthony R. Gold posted

You truly believe the more honourable things to have done in 1939 with
respect the attack on Poland and in 2001 with respect to the attack on the
USA would have been to ignore our mutual defence treaty obligations and not
to join in waging wars against Germany and Afghanistan respectively?

In 1939 the Franco-British alliance did absolutely **** all to defend
Poland against Germany. I'm not quite sure what purpose was served by
declaring war, but it certainly wasn't to help the Poles.

And in 2001 there were no treaties obliging Britain to attack a third
country as a result of criminal offences committed by individuals in the
USA. Considering what has happened since then, I would much rather "we"
had had no agreements whatsoever with the poisonous, murdering *******s
who have been running US Machtpolitik.

--
Les
"If just one child is saved, then we'll have created a police state for the
benefit of just one child."

Robin T Cox wrote:

What is a collective noun for Steves?

A Kevin of Steves

Sam Nelson wrote:

In what sense is what's going on in Afghanistan `defensive'? From who
or what are the troops there defending us?

From opium and its derivatives.

Bazzer Smith wrote:
Time to forget all this glorifying war lark and move on I think.
Waste of time and money too.

The very fact that you cannot spell REMEMBRANCE shows why we need it.

Bazzer Smith wrote:
Time to forget all this glorifying war lark and move on I think.
Waste of time and money too.

Yawn.
Every year, on the second sunday of November, somebody posts this very
question, with the sole intent of provoking an argument.
As trolls go, this is a remarkably poor one.
Haven't you got any fresh material?

Robin T Cox wrote:
Steve Walker wrote:

Sam Nelson wrote:
In article ,
says...
steve robinson wrote:
Bazzer Smith wrote:

Time to forget all this glorifying war lark and move on I think.
Waste of time and money too.
Its not about glorifying war its about remembering the dead and
injured sent into battle because of the shameful failure of our
political leaders
Well said, Steve
That's right. You Steves all stick together and save us from the
nasty troll.
Damn right - it's the Trinity of the Steve. Wait till one more arrives
and we morph into a fighting robot.

.


What is a collective noun for Steves?


A Dore....

Anthony R. Gold wrote:

On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:10:25 GMT, "steve robinson"
wrote:

Bazzer Smith wrote:

Time to forget all this glorifying war lark and move on I think.
Waste of time and money too.

Its not about glorifying war its about remembering the dead and injured
sent into battle because of the shameful failure of our political leaders

You truly believe the more honourable things to have done in 1939 with
respect the attack on Poland and in 2001 with respect to the attack on the
USA would have been to ignore our mutual defence treaty obligations and not
to join in waging wars against Germany and Afghanistan respectively?

Tony
That in itself shows how the polititons and diplomats failed the people of
europe in allowing the situation to develop in Germany which allowed the rise
of the nazi party , in a country that was not supposed to have a military
capeablity after the first world war

The Afghan people did not attack the USA , the main perpatrator behind the
attacks was Ozma Bin Laden a Saudi citezen trained in Scotland by the SAS ,
sent to help the Taliban (who both the uk and usa supplied weapons to) in thier
fight against the ussr as it was then . Another act which shows how stupid our
polititions really are


Sometimes war is inevitable , most of the time its not , our political leaders
would be far less inclinded to go nto battle if they had to lead the troops
from the front not a concrete bunker with the full knowledge if there is an
attack on the uk because of thier lack of ablity to resolve problems through
diplomacy they themselves fall among the chosen few that will be protected at
all costs
--