On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:35:54 +0000, judith
wrote:

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:26:18 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

On Nov 13, 10:06*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:43 -0000, "stircrazy"

wrote:

"judith" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:31:32 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

Sorry to be a bit thick - can you explain why you put (not) in the
subject?

Because hes not a Ppaedophile

I thought he said that *he had a sexual preference
for boys aged 11 to 13.

ie he is a paedophile, knows it, and admits it.

That is not the only criterion.

I think it is sufficient - an adult who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

He was sexually attracted to children - ergo he is a paedophile.

A paedophile is sexually attracted to *prepubescent* children. Mr
Lambert appears to be an ephebophile (also known as a hebephile) as he
appears to be sexually attracted to adolescents.

--
Dissenter

On Nov 13, 10:35*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:26:18 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst



wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:06*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:43 -0000, "stircrazy"

wrote:

"judith" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:31:32 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

Sorry to be a bit thick - can you explain why you put (not) in the
subject?

Because hes not a Ppaedophile

I thought he said that *he had a sexual preference
for boys aged 11 to 13.

ie he is a paedophile, knows it, and admits it.

That is not the only criterion.

I think it is sufficient - an adult who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

He was sexually *attracted to children - ergo he is a paedophile.

I have posted the details on this a number of times.

WM

On Nov 13, 10:47*pm, Dissenter wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:35:54 +0000, judith
wrote:



On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:26:18 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

On Nov 13, 10:06*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:43 -0000, "stircrazy"

wrote:

"judith" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:31:32 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

Sorry to be a bit thick - can you explain why you put (not) in the
subject?

Because hes not a Ppaedophile

I thought he said that *he had a sexual preference
for boys aged 11 to 13.

ie he is a paedophile, knows it, and admits it.

That is not the only criterion.

I think it is sufficient - an adult who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

He was sexually *attracted to children - ergo he is a paedophile.

A paedophile is sexually attracted to *prepubescent* children. Mr
Lambert appears to be an ephebophile (also known as a hebephile) as he
appears to be sexually attracted to adolescents.

--
Dissenter

No, MAAs are

WM

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:05:57 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

On Nov 13, 10:35*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:26:18 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst



wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:06*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:43 -0000, "stircrazy"

wrote:

"judith" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:31:32 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

Sorry to be a bit thick - can you explain why you put (not) in the
subject?

Because hes not a Ppaedophile

I thought he said that *he had a sexual preference
for boys aged 11 to 13.

ie he is a paedophile, knows it, and admits it.

That is not the only criterion.

I think it is sufficient - an adult who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

He was sexually *attracted to children - ergo he is a paedophile.

I have posted the details on this a number of times.

WM


OED :
A. n. An adult who is sexually attracted to children.

He is a paedophile - and anyone else who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

Are *you* sexually attracted to children?

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:47:51 +0000, Dissenter wrote:

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:35:54 +0000, judith
wrote:

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:26:18 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

On Nov 13, 10:06*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:43 -0000, "stircrazy"

wrote:

"judith" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:31:32 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

Sorry to be a bit thick - can you explain why you put (not) in the
subject?

Because hes not a Ppaedophile

I thought he said that *he had a sexual preference
for boys aged 11 to 13.

ie he is a paedophile, knows it, and admits it.

That is not the only criterion.

I think it is sufficient - an adult who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

He was sexually attracted to children - ergo he is a paedophile.

A paedophile is sexually attracted to *prepubescent* children. Mr
Lambert appears to be an ephebophile (also known as a hebephile) as he
appears to be sexually attracted to adolescents.


You need to contact the OED and get them to correct their definition:

A. n. An adult who is sexually attracted to children.

"judith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:05:57 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

On Nov 13, 10:35 pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:26:18 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst



wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:06 pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:43 -0000, "stircrazy"

wrote:

"judith" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:31:32 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

Sorry to be a bit thick - can you explain why you put (not) in the
subject?

Because hes not a Ppaedophile

I thought he said that he had a sexual preference
for boys aged 11 to 13.

ie he is a paedophile, knows it, and admits it.

That is not the only criterion.

I think it is sufficient - an adult who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

He was sexually attracted to children - ergo he is a paedophile.

I have posted the details on this a number of times.

WM


OED :
A. n. An adult who is sexually attracted to children.

He is a paedophile - and anyone else who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

Are *you* sexually attracted to children?

The difficulty comes with the definition of "children" which changes from
country to country and probably from one generation to another.

Arguably, anyone who is sexually attracted to people under the age of 18 is
a paedophile. Perhaps that should be regarded as normal and acceptable, and
a new word should be invented for those who are sexually attracted to
prepubescent children.

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:38:19 +0000, The Tank
wrote:

judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:43 -0000, "stircrazy"
wrote:

"judith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:31:32 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:




Sorry to be a bit thick - can you explain why you put (not) in the
subject?
Because hes not a Ppaedophile


I thought he said that he had a sexual preference
for boys aged 11 to 13.

ie he is a paedophile, knows it, and admits it.


To who?


By definition - he has said he is sexually attracted to boys aged 11
to 13.

Therefore he is a paedophile.

Not too difficult that - is it?

The Toda

Arguably, anyone who is sexually attracted to people under the age of 18 is
a paedophile. Perhaps that should be regarded as normal and acceptable, and
a new word should be invented for those who are sexually attracted to
prepubescent children.



Yet it would be legal to have a sexual relationship with a sixteen
year old? Provided you didnt have any "indecent" pictures of them?

On Nov 14, 1:20*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:05:57 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst



wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:35*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:26:18 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst

wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:06*pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:43 -0000, "stircrazy"

wrote:

"judith" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:31:32 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

Sorry to be a bit thick - can you explain why you put (not) in the
subject?

Because hes not a Ppaedophile

I thought he said that *he had a sexual preference
for boys aged 11 to 13.

ie he is a paedophile, knows it, and admits it.

That is not the only criterion.

I think it is sufficient - an adult who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

He was sexually *attracted to children - ergo he is a paedophile.

I have posted the details on this a number of times.

WM

OED :
A. n. * *An adult who is sexually attracted to children.

He is a paedophile - and anyone else who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

Are *you* sexually attracted to children?

Yes, part of my sexuality is being a MAA.

Dictionaries are not primary sources.

You only have to search the Internet (or, dare I say, even, read a few
books/papers?), or through the Usenet archive, or visit my website,
for a full and detailed set of responses (and literature sources) to
similar, ill-informed soundbytes, from your predecessors.

You will or you will not.

I care not which one you do.

WM

On Nov 14, 1:26*pm, "The Todal" wrote:
"judith" wrote in message

...



On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:05:57 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

On Nov 13, 10:35 pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:26:18 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst

wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:06 pm, judith wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:43 -0000, "stircrazy"

wrote:

"judith" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:31:32 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote:

Sorry to be a bit thick - can you explain why you put (not) in the
subject?

Because hes not a Ppaedophile

I thought he said that he had a sexual preference
for boys aged 11 to 13.

ie he is a paedophile, knows it, and admits it.

That is not the only criterion.

I think it is sufficient - an adult who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

He was sexually attracted to children - ergo he is a paedophile.

I have posted the details on this a number of times.

WM

OED :
A. n. * *An adult who is sexually attracted to children.

He is a paedophile - and anyone else who is sexually attracted to
children is a paedophile.

Are *you* sexually attracted to children?

The difficulty comes with the definition of "children" which changes from
country to country and probably from one generation to another.

Arguably, anyone who is sexually attracted to people under the age of 18 is
a paedophile. Perhaps that should be regarded as normal and acceptable, and
a new word should be invented for those who are sexually attracted to
prepubescent children.

The words have been 'invented' and are clearly-defined in the
psychological literature (although, little is in concrete, in the
pschyo/psychia areas).

WM