![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal (Legal Issues in the UK) (uk.legal) An unmoderated forum to discuss all aspects of legal issues within the UK. |
| Tags: bibs, community, criminals, jack, orange, says, service, serving, straw, wear, will |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 28, 4:31*pm, Special Care
wrote: On Nov 28, 4:25*pm, Webmanager_CritEst wrote: On Nov 28, 4:23*pm, Special Care wrote: There's a lot of debate about "public shaming." I remember reading a couple of favourable reports on it from USA, but I don't know what the ultimate answer is.http://www.restorativejustice.org/ed...feb08/saruling I am all for restorative justice, but that does not include the humiliation of anyone. WM ---------------- Is telling the truth about someone "humiliation." Is it wrong to tell the truth about someone? Or to impose on them the requirement that they display a placard telling the truth about themselves? Yes, to some ... and then they seek revenge. WM |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 28, 4:31*pm, Special Care
wrote: On Nov 28, 4:25*pm, Webmanager_CritEst wrote: On Nov 28, 4:23*pm, Special Care wrote: There's a lot of debate about "public shaming." I remember reading a couple of favourable reports on it from USA, but I don't know what the ultimate answer is.http://www.restorativejustice.org/ed...feb08/saruling I am all for restorative justice, but that does not include the humiliation of anyone. WM ---------------- Is telling the truth about someone "humiliation." Is it wrong to tell the truth about someone? Or to impose on them the requirement that they display a placard telling the truth about themselves? Yes, to some ... and then they seek revenge. WM |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:43:30 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst
wrote: Criminals serving Community Service will have to wear orange bibs, says Jack Straw 27/11/2008 Jack Straw Community Payback Offenders will be forced into orange uniforms when they carry out community sentences from Monday. In an exclusive interview, Justice Secretary Jack Straw revealed he is making it compulsory to put wrong-doers into “vests of shame” from next week. He is pressing ahead despite fears Guantanamo-style outfits will humiliate the wearers. A total of 10,000 high- visibility tabards with “community payback” emblazoned across the back have been ordered by the Ministry of Justice. The words are in purple and there will also be a “community payback” logo on the front. And what if these become designer items and are worn by the general public? Will Straw have non-offenders arrested? Then they'll be able to wear 'em anyway. MM |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Webmanager_CritEst wrote:
Criminals serving Community Service will have to wear orange bibs, says Jack Straw 27/11/2008 Jack Straw Community Payback Offenders will be forced into orange uniforms when they carry out community sentences from Monday. In an exclusive interview, Justice Secretary Jack Straw revealed he is making it compulsory to put wrong-doers into “vests of shame” from next week. He is pressing ahead despite fears Guantanamo-style outfits will humiliate the wearers. A total of 10,000 high- visibility tabards with “community payback” emblazoned across the back have been ordered by the Ministry of Justice. The words are in purple and there will also be a “community payback” logo on the front. The uniforms will become a common sight as offenders wear them while doing manual labour on Britain’s streets. The vests have been made orange to make sure thugs cannot claim they are construction or council workers who wear yellow outfits. And Mr Straw told the Daily Mirror it was part of a shake-up to put punishment back at the heart of the criminal justice system. He said it was time to make it tougher for offenders. Mr Straw said: “The whole purpose of this is to strengthen the effectiveness of community punishments and improve the public’s confidence in them. “Community punishments are effective – often more effective than short prison sentence. “But some offenders think when they are given a community punishment they are being let off. “And the public can be forgiven for thinking the same thing. too.” He added: “The public want to know the sentence is first and foremost about punishment.” Probation officers are expected to attack the move as demeaning to offenders and dangerous as they could lead to attacks. But Government Respect Tsar Louise Casey who has headed a major inquiry into restoring public confidence in the criminal justice system said it was time to make sentences tougher. Sitting alongside Mr Straw, she said: “What is important is that people who break the law face a consequence and that isn’t pleasant. “The point of the orange jackets is not to humiliate people but to make the punishment visible. We have got to be clear that if you wake up in the morning, you go out and commit a criminal offence then you are going to face a consequence. “One of those consequences is that you will end up in an orange jacket cleaning the streets in your community. From Monday that is the message.’’ She added: “This is about making people accountable for the offences they commit. “The public want this to happen and it’s going to happen.” Ms Casey added that as well as pushing offenders it would also deter other youngsters from carrying out crimes. She tells a story of how in a trial scheme in Birmingham, offenders were made to clean toilets in a community centre. “One of the kids said ‘The last thing I want to do is clean those toilets. I think I’ll steer clear of trouble. This is why visibility is so important.” Mr Straw has acknowledged it had been a tough battle to bring in the new uniforms with the Probation Service warning they would be the modern equivalent of chain gangs. Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke had to do an embarrassing U-turn when he first suggested the plan in 2005. And critics claimed it would mean offenders being humiliated in orange Guantanamo Bay-style boiler suits. But Mr Straw said it was important probation officers who supervise criminals when they carry out community sentences toughen up. He said: “Some parts of the Probation Service have frankly lost their way over the years. “It is really important they get it back. Otherwise the public pressure for more and more offenders to go to prison will increase. It is very important for the Probation Service and the future of the Probation Service. “It is vital that given the very large sums of money spent on the Probation Service that the Probation Service better connect with the public.” He added: “There has been a lot of anxiety about humiliation. “But the crucial thing is this – people who become offenders humiliate themselves.” Ms Casey added: “We have to be clear when we punish people. That means we can be clear we are spending money and time making sure they don’t do it again.” Ministers are also thinking about getting people to nominate “grot spots” which need cleaning up. Ms Casey people should be able to phone up a special telephone line or nominate at public meetings areas they wanted cleaned up. The public must see consequences for people committing offences.” Mr Straw also said reforming community sentences would have a big impact on jail overcrowding. He said: “Magistrates will tell you they send people to prison out of frustration that offenders have not got the message after a number of chances with community sentences. “The more effective we can make community sentences then the fewer people will need to be sent to prison.” http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-sto...5875-20929997/ *** “The more effective we can make community sentences then the fewer people will need to be sent to prison.” You idiot, Straw ...to think this is, in any way, 'effective'. WM www.critest.com From what I've been told community service sentences are seen as a bit of a joke by offenders and if this is generally the case silly labels, dunces caps, or red noses will not fix that. Community service should not be a waste of time, and should engage the mind and will of the offender on appropriate productive tasks. Evidently all the government can come up with is the price of a few labels. j |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
"MM" wrote in message ... On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:43:30 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst wrote: Criminals serving Community Service will have to wear orange bibs, says Jack Straw 27/11/2008 Jack Straw Community Payback Offenders will be forced into orange uniforms when they carry out community sentences from Monday. In an exclusive interview, Justice Secretary Jack Straw revealed he is making it compulsory to put wrong-doers into "vests of shame" from next week. He is pressing ahead despite fears Guantanamo-style outfits will humiliate the wearers. A total of 10,000 high- visibility tabards with "community payback" emblazoned across the back have been ordered by the Ministry of Justice. The words are in purple and there will also be a "community payback" logo on the front. And what if these become designer items and are worn by the general public? Will Straw have non-offenders arrested? Then they'll be able to wear 'em anyway. MM Prison clothing gets good money on ebay |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
djornsk wrote:
Webmanager_CritEst wrote: Criminals serving Community Service will have to wear orange bibs, says Jack Straw 27/11/2008 Jack Straw Community Payback Offenders will be forced into orange uniforms when they carry out community sentences from Monday. In an exclusive interview, Justice Secretary Jack Straw revealed he is making it compulsory to put wrong-doers into “vests of shame” from next week. He is pressing ahead despite fears Guantanamo-style outfits will humiliate the wearers. A total of 10,000 high- visibility tabards with “community payback” emblazoned across the back have been ordered by the Ministry of Justice. The words are in purple and there will also be a “community payback” logo on the front. The uniforms will become a common sight as offenders wear them while doing manual labour on Britain’s streets. The vests have been made orange to make sure thugs cannot claim they are construction or council workers who wear yellow outfits. And Mr Straw told the Daily Mirror it was part of a shake-up to put punishment back at the heart of the criminal justice system. He said it was time to make it tougher for offenders. Mr Straw said: “The whole purpose of this is to strengthen the effectiveness of community punishments and improve the public’s confidence in them. “Community punishments are effective – often more effective than short prison sentence. “But some offenders think when they are given a community punishment they are being let off. “And the public can be forgiven for thinking the same thing. too.” He added: “The public want to know the sentence is first and foremost about punishment.” Probation officers are expected to attack the move as demeaning to offenders and dangerous as they could lead to attacks. But Government Respect Tsar Louise Casey who has headed a major inquiry into restoring public confidence in the criminal justice system said it was time to make sentences tougher. Sitting alongside Mr Straw, she said: “What is important is that people who break the law face a consequence and that isn’t pleasant. “The point of the orange jackets is not to humiliate people but to make the punishment visible. We have got to be clear that if you wake up in the morning, you go out and commit a criminal offence then you are going to face a consequence. “One of those consequences is that you will end up in an orange jacket cleaning the streets in your community. From Monday that is the message.’’ She added: “This is about making people accountable for the offences they commit. “The public want this to happen and it’s going to happen.” Ms Casey added that as well as pushing offenders it would also deter other youngsters from carrying out crimes. She tells a story of how in a trial scheme in Birmingham, offenders were made to clean toilets in a community centre. “One of the kids said ‘The last thing I want to do is clean those toilets. I think I’ll steer clear of trouble. This is why visibility is so important.” Mr Straw has acknowledged it had been a tough battle to bring in the new uniforms with the Probation Service warning they would be the modern equivalent of chain gangs. Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke had to do an embarrassing U-turn when he first suggested the plan in 2005. And critics claimed it would mean offenders being humiliated in orange Guantanamo Bay-style boiler suits. But Mr Straw said it was important probation officers who supervise criminals when they carry out community sentences toughen up. He said: “Some parts of the Probation Service have frankly lost their way over the years. “It is really important they get it back. Otherwise the public pressure for more and more offenders to go to prison will increase. It is very important for the Probation Service and the future of the Probation Service. “It is vital that given the very large sums of money spent on the Probation Service that the Probation Service better connect with the public.” He added: “There has been a lot of anxiety about humiliation. “But the crucial thing is this – people who become offenders humiliate themselves.” Ms Casey added: “We have to be clear when we punish people. That means we can be clear we are spending money and time making sure they don’t do it again.” Ministers are also thinking about getting people to nominate “grot spots” which need cleaning up. Ms Casey people should be able to phone up a special telephone line or nominate at public meetings areas they wanted cleaned up. The public must see consequences for people committing offences.” Mr Straw also said reforming community sentences would have a big impact on jail overcrowding. He said: “Magistrates will tell you they send people to prison out of frustration that offenders have not got the message after a number of chances with community sentences. “The more effective we can make community sentences then the fewer people will need to be sent to prison.” http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-sto...5875-20929997/ *** “The more effective we can make community sentences then the fewer people will need to be sent to prison.” You idiot, Straw ...to think this is, in any way, 'effective'. WM www.critest.com From what I've been told community service sentences are seen as a bit of a joke by offenders and if this is generally the case silly labels, dunces caps, or red noses will not fix that. Community service should not be a waste of time, and should engage the mind and will of the offender on appropriate productive tasks. Evidently all the government can come up with is the price of a few labels. j All too literally: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labelling_theory |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
djornsk wrote:
Webmanager_CritEst wrote: Criminals serving Community Service will have to wear orange bibs, says Jack Straw 27/11/2008 Jack Straw Community Payback Offenders will be forced into orange uniforms when they carry out community sentences from Monday. In an exclusive interview, Justice Secretary Jack Straw revealed he is making it compulsory to put wrong-doers into “vests of shame” from next week. He is pressing ahead despite fears Guantanamo-style outfits will humiliate the wearers. A total of 10,000 high- visibility tabards with “community payback” emblazoned across the back have been ordered by the Ministry of Justice. The words are in purple and there will also be a “community payback” logo on the front. The uniforms will become a common sight as offenders wear them while doing manual labour on Britain’s streets. The vests have been made orange to make sure thugs cannot claim they are construction or council workers who wear yellow outfits. And Mr Straw told the Daily Mirror it was part of a shake-up to put punishment back at the heart of the criminal justice system. He said it was time to make it tougher for offenders. Mr Straw said: “The whole purpose of this is to strengthen the effectiveness of community punishments and improve the public’s confidence in them. “Community punishments are effective – often more effective than short prison sentence. “But some offenders think when they are given a community punishment they are being let off. “And the public can be forgiven for thinking the same thing. too.” He added: “The public want to know the sentence is first and foremost about punishment.” Probation officers are expected to attack the move as demeaning to offenders and dangerous as they could lead to attacks. But Government Respect Tsar Louise Casey who has headed a major inquiry into restoring public confidence in the criminal justice system said it was time to make sentences tougher. Sitting alongside Mr Straw, she said: “What is important is that people who break the law face a consequence and that isn’t pleasant. “The point of the orange jackets is not to humiliate people but to make the punishment visible. We have got to be clear that if you wake up in the morning, you go out and commit a criminal offence then you are going to face a consequence. “One of those consequences is that you will end up in an orange jacket cleaning the streets in your community. From Monday that is the message.’’ She added: “This is about making people accountable for the offences they commit. “The public want this to happen and it’s going to happen.” Ms Casey added that as well as pushing offenders it would also deter other youngsters from carrying out crimes. She tells a story of how in a trial scheme in Birmingham, offenders were made to clean toilets in a community centre. “One of the kids said ‘The last thing I want to do is clean those toilets. I think I’ll steer clear of trouble. This is why visibility is so important.” Mr Straw has acknowledged it had been a tough battle to bring in the new uniforms with the Probation Service warning they would be the modern equivalent of chain gangs. Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke had to do an embarrassing U-turn when he first suggested the plan in 2005. And critics claimed it would mean offenders being humiliated in orange Guantanamo Bay-style boiler suits. But Mr Straw said it was important probation officers who supervise criminals when they carry out community sentences toughen up. He said: “Some parts of the Probation Service have frankly lost their way over the years. “It is really important they get it back. Otherwise the public pressure for more and more offenders to go to prison will increase. It is very important for the Probation Service and the future of the Probation Service. “It is vital that given the very large sums of money spent on the Probation Service that the Probation Service better connect with the public.” He added: “There has been a lot of anxiety about humiliation. “But the crucial thing is this – people who become offenders humiliate themselves.” Ms Casey added: “We have to be clear when we punish people. That means we can be clear we are spending money and time making sure they don’t do it again.” Ministers are also thinking about getting people to nominate “grot spots” which need cleaning up. Ms Casey people should be able to phone up a special telephone line or nominate at public meetings areas they wanted cleaned up. The public must see consequences for people committing offences.” Mr Straw also said reforming community sentences would have a big impact on jail overcrowding. He said: “Magistrates will tell you they send people to prison out of frustration that offenders have not got the message after a number of chances with community sentences. “The more effective we can make community sentences then the fewer people will need to be sent to prison.” http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-sto...5875-20929997/ *** “The more effective we can make community sentences then the fewer people will need to be sent to prison.” You idiot, Straw ...to think this is, in any way, 'effective'. WM www.critest.com From what I've been told community service sentences are seen as a bit of a joke by offenders and if this is generally the case silly labels, dunces caps, or red noses will not fix that. Community service should not be a waste of time, and should engage the mind and will of the offender on appropriate productive tasks. Evidently all the government can come up with is the price of a few labels. j This is an appalling idea - entirely worthy of the person and the government that thought it up. Humiliation doesn't work, and won't work. There are two main reasons nowadays for repeat offending amongst young people - leaving aside those engaged in higher level crime, where money is the clear motive - drugs, and a dislike (bordering on hatred) of authority. One way to get though to most young offenders (not all, of course, some are so far gone as to be impossible to deal with), is to build up their self-respect and feelings of self-worth. Low self-esteem and anti-social activities often go hand-in-hand. Parading them in the street with the equivalent of a clown's outfit is the very last thing that most of them need. There is also the small matter of getting the horse to drink once you've taken it to the water. I suspect that this scheme will give those that have to administer and supervise it rather more trouble than is anticipated. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Special Care wrote:
On Nov 28, 4:25 pm, Webmanager_CritEst wrote: On Nov 28, 4:23 pm, Special Care wrote: There's a lot of debate about "public shaming." I remember reading a couple of favourable reports on it from USA, but I don't know what the ultimate answer is.http://www.restorativejustice.org/ed...feb08/saruling I am all for restorative justice, but that does not include the humiliation of anyone. WM ---------------- Is telling the truth about someone "humiliation." Is it wrong to tell the truth about someone? Of course not. Tell us your real name and address and we'll see what your neighbours, employers and parents think about your fixation with your mothers anus. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 28, 5:32*pm, Terry Harris wrote:
Special Care wrote: Is telling the truth about someone "humiliation." Is it wrong to tell the truth about someone? Of course not. Tell us your real name and address and we'll see what your neighbours, employers and parents think about your fixation with your mothers anus. =========================== I have repeatedly stated my real name and town of residence and landline telephone number. You talk as if a "fixation with your mother's anus" is a shameful / humiliating revelation. If you would just read what I have written, you will see that I am saying that the universal and most fundamental psychological / evolutionary law, sometimes known as the "imprinting" process or "brain wiring," unavoidaby causes every human infant to have a fixation with the mother's anus. It's not immediately obvious to most people, but becomes obvious when clearly explained. The difference between us is that I remember my infancy and you have forgotten your infancy, so you see the authentic emotional drives of infants as shameful / humiliating. If natural functioning were permitted, without repression or toxic shame, there would be no unhealthy fixations or obsessions or fetishes, but only progress and evolution and harmony and joy, in tandem with healthy expressions of our mammalian love impulses, time and mood permitting, and always with consent and respect. I want to bring all this out in the open, as that is an essential part of the healing process. The neighbours in this town may or may not be aware of my internet activity. I don't try to conceal it but most people at this time will misunderstand. I have directed my GP, local health service chiefs and the Director of Social Services for North Yorkshire to my healing writings and discussed them with my GP; the others were not willing to discuss them. If you want to tell everyone else in North Yorkshire about my healing writings, feel free. They will respond as people generally so far have responded to my healing formula: a small number will express acceptance and approval, a similarly small number will tell me I'm writing "filth" [which can only mean human babies - ALL human babies - are "filth"], and the rest of them will say nothing. "There is no such thing as bad publicity" when it comes to promoting new ideas or products. At some time further down the line, the ideas I have promoted will "catch on," because they MUST, as we all have a deep-seated craving for genuine healing. -Peter Newman, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England / tel. +44-1423-546746 --------------------------------------------------- Your Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes, Mrs ! http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dddp6bt4_121hsrds9ww |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 28, 4:48*pm, MM wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:43:30 -0800 (PST), Webmanager_CritEst The words are in purple and there will also be a “community payback” logo on the front. And what if these become designer items and are worn by the general public? Will Straw have non-offenders arrested? Then they'll be able to wear 'em anyway. MM ---------------------------------------- On reflection, I do think this will degenerate into farce if applied to young people in this country. The reports from USA that I read were about more mature people, with jobs and families, who - when found guilty of non-violent offences such as drunk driving or non-payment of child maintenance - were given the choice of displaying a placard on the street for a week, stating their crime, or going to jail for a month or two. Understandably, they took the option of displaying the placard, and reported that it was an effective deterrent. Young people in England are something else. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|