![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is no need for a Witness Statement to be either sealed, or time
stamped.When serving witness statements one simply sends it direct to one's opponent. Witness Statements should only be filed with the Court if ordered; in any event they will usually form part of the trial bundle, and that bundle is, of course, eventually filed with the Court. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
smicker wrote:
Thanks. I have now learned that from other posters on here and although I was wrong, it was the procedure required by the local CC before they changed their minds. The advice here is now making this ng by far better than the old ng and I am grateful to those here who answer questions. The only caveat to that is that as the witness statement was filed after witness statements were exchanged you did need to make an application to get the witness statement in. The statement itself as others have said does not need a stamp. You did get a copy of the order saying that the statement could be allowed in? -- Kind regards Benedict White I am not a lawyer. Please note that my email address is not checked regularly and will be used for harvesting UCE. If you want to email me work out my address from the following, my first name at law 4 free daht org daht uk. If this cause accessibility problems to those who are blind etc., please post a follow up, and I will try and improve the situation. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
smicker wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:30:10 +0100, Benedict White wrote: smicker wrote: Thanks. I have now learned that from other posters on here and although I was wrong, it was the procedure required by the local CC before they changed their minds. The advice here is now making this ng by far better than the old ng and I am grateful to those here who answer questions. The only caveat to that is that as the witness statement was filed after witness statements were exchanged you did need to make an application to get the witness statement in. The statement itself as others have said does not need a stamp. You did get a copy of the order saying that the statement could be allowed in? Yes I put it in with a N244 application and I have received notification from the court that one has gone through ex-parte. I am now awaiting a decision on a second statement and exhibits that were necessary because of the line the other side took in their rebuttal thanks Benedict. No problem. -- Kind regards Benedict White I am not a lawyer. Please note that my email address is not checked regularly and will be used for harvesting UCE. If you want to email me work out my address from the following, my first name at law 4 free daht org daht uk. If this cause accessibility problems to those who are blind etc., please post a follow up, and I will try and improve the situation. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|