![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:40:05 +0100, IanAl wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:50:07 +0100, bigbrian wrote: On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:50:09 +0100, IanAl wrote: Surely they can claim for loss of earnings that they would have got if they had been free? That's presumably what they have been compensated for, which accounts for the differences between what Michael Hickey (£990,000) and Vincent Hickey (£506,000) received for the same 18 years inside So what about compensation for loss of freedom? Exactly my point. Scenario a) You're told you can't work for the next eighteen years, but at the end of it, you'll be given 18 years worth of income Scenario b) You're told you have to be imprisoned for the next 18 years, but at the end of it, you can receive the same amount as in scenario a) Tough call, huh? Brian |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|