On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 01:00:18 +0100, Chris Street
wrote:

On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 23:35:05 +0100, Mike Tomlinson wrote:

In article , Chris Street
writes

Any moderator care to mention why this post here was rejected
http://www.moderation.org.uk/3displa...=3displayul m
.php

I'm not a moderator, but your post contained far too much quoted
material and was way off topic, offering computer technical advice in a
group intended for the discussion of legal issues.

Which could also be levelled at the post that was allowed through. I'm
wondering why there was the inconsistency.

Because moderators are human beings. There's no less likelihood of
eliminating inconsistency in the subjective opinions of moderators
than there is in doing the same thing with Premiership referrees.

Brian