![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In due course just how much compensation Neil Sharman and Kevin Fagan will
receive ... -- regards or otherwise, Periander |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Periander." wrote in message ... In due course just how much compensation Neil Sharman and Kevin Fagan will receive ... Whom are they claiming from? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"The Todal" wrote in message
... "Periander." wrote in message ... In due course just how much compensation Neil Sharman and Kevin Fagan will receive ... Whom are they claiming from? No one as yet, but cynic that I am and in the light of the likely quality of the "new evidence", combined with the simple fact that it is in anyway unlikely to undermine their basic defence (which has already been repeatedly ruled upon) the phrases malicious prosecution, abuse of process and unlawful imprisonment spring to mind. -- regards, Periander |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:30:06 +0100, "Periander."
wrote: In due course just how much compensation Neil Sharman and Kevin Fagan will receive ... Whatever it is, I'm sure they'll do the decent thing and hand it over to Harry Stanley's widow Brian |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Periander. wrote:
"The Todal" wrote in message ... "Periander." wrote in message ... In due course just how much compensation Neil Sharman and Kevin Fagan will receive ... Whom are they claiming from? No one as yet, but cynic that I am and in the light of the likely quality of the "new evidence", combined with the simple fact that it is in anyway unlikely to undermine their basic defence (which has already been repeatedly ruled upon) the phrases malicious prosecution, abuse of process and unlawful imprisonment spring to mind. And libel from those who have called them murderers and cast doubts on their abilities? -- Howard Neil |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|