![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted
(the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted
(the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable? The exact wording of the clause if crucial as well as information about the kind of business. Without that information nobody can tell. Peter Crosland |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:20:06 +0000, "Marco"
wrote: My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted (the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable? Probably. We would have to see the clause, and it would depend on the exact circumstances. It is by no means certain. But in principle, such clauses are legal provided they are not of too long a duration. -- Alex Heney, Global Villager Earth is 98% full... please delete anyone you can. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Marco wrote:
My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted (the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable? We have a similar one in our Contract at work.When I joined the Company, it was purely a photographic services company, we have expanded, and now do many types of vending machines, including toys,sweets,mobile phone chargers etc. The Clause says something like you cannot work for another Company in the same line of business for 3 months on leaving. I asked my Union rep about it once, and he said there was no way they could stop me joining another photo or vending company, as the clause is so restricitive and wide ranging, that it would be unenforceable. Obviously depends on your circumstances, if you were the only Company to be able to clone humans successfully, then such a clause would be required to stop people leaving and taking the secrets with them. Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Marco wrote: My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted (the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable? Perhaps. Such clauses are not uncommon, but it is a question for the Courts whether they are enforceable. There are a variety of considerations that are taken in to account when deciding whether such a term is enforceable. These include, for example, the nature of her job; her seniority; how close her relationship is with the businesses customers; what, if any, geographical restrictions are included in the clause. Without further details about her job, the nature of the business and so on it is impossible to give anything other than an equivocal answer. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Alex Heney" wrote in message ... On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:20:06 +0000, "Marco" wrote: My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted (the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable? Probably. We would have to see the clause, and it would depend on the exact circumstances. It is by no means certain. But in principle, such clauses are legal provided they are not of too long a duration. -- Alex Heney, Global Villager Earth is 98% full... please delete anyone you can. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom Six months is the outside limit of what might be enforceable in most cases - I certainly wouldn't say it's "probably" enforceable. And if the wording isn't clear that will certainly count against the employer. In principle such clauses are void unless reasonable to protect legitimate interests of the employer. Chris R |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
As it's a contract of employment, when your employment ends, doesn't the contract too! Just wondered like... And in any case, what would/could happen? They sue you for damages of some kind? They would issue an injunction against the company you were going to work for, and threaten to claim damages from them. I have done this in the past with an employee who tried to ignore the provisions of his contract - it worked & protected the business for 3 months. SalesGuy |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike wrote: As it's a contract of employment, when your employment ends, doesn't the contract too! Just wondered like... And in any case, what would/could happen? They sue you for damages of some kind? Their primary remedy that they would seek would probably be an injunction, but damages also. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
The courts are generally unwilling to enforce clauses restricting
employees' ability to change employment. Six months *anywhere* is probably too wide-ranging to be enforceable; six months *within 20 miles* is probably enforceable - depending on where you are, if you only have one major town within 20 miles it might still be too restrictive. IANAL and just thinking out loud... Should there not be some sort of remuneration agreement in such cases for the interim period - without such, could a previous employment contract be enforced ? |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Colin Wilson wrote: The courts are generally unwilling to enforce clauses restricting employees' ability to change employment. Six months *anywhere* is probably too wide-ranging to be enforceable; six months *within 20 miles* is probably enforceable - depending on where you are, if you only have one major town within 20 miles it might still be too restrictive. IANAL and just thinking out loud... Should there not be some sort of remuneration agreement in such cases for the interim period - without such, could a previous employment contract be enforced ? The short answer is yes, it is possible to enforce these clauses without payment in the meantime. However, they can be tricky to enforce. If you really want to stop someone working the better option is to put them on garden leave, in which case you do still have to pay them. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|