A UK legal issues forum. Legal Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Legal Banter forum » Legal Newsgroups » uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden.

Future employment restriction in job contract



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 7th 06, 11:20 AM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Marco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Future employment restriction in job contract

My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted
(the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the
company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months
afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable?


  #2  
Old November 7th 06, 04:55 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Peter Crosland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,084
Default Future employment restriction in job contract

My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted
(the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the
company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six
months afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable?


The exact wording of the clause if crucial as well as information about the
kind of business. Without that information nobody can tell.

Peter Crosland



  #3  
Old November 7th 06, 05:15 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Alex Heney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23,205
Default Future employment restriction in job contract

On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:20:06 +0000, "Marco"
wrote:

My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted
(the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the
company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months
afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable?


Probably.

We would have to see the clause, and it would depend on the exact
circumstances. It is by no means certain.

But in principle, such clauses are legal provided they are not of too
long a duration.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Earth is 98% full... please delete anyone you can.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom

  #4  
Old November 7th 06, 05:15 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
A.Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 257
Default Future employment restriction in job contract

Marco wrote:

My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted
(the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the
company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months
afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable?


We have a similar one in our Contract at work.When I joined the Company,
it was purely a photographic services company, we have expanded, and now
do many types of vending machines, including toys,sweets,mobile phone
chargers etc.
The Clause says something like you cannot work for another Company in
the same line of business for 3 months on leaving.

I asked my Union rep about it once, and he said there was no way they
could stop me joining another photo or vending company, as the clause is
so restricitive and wide ranging, that it would be unenforceable.

Obviously depends on your circumstances, if you were the only Company to
be able to clone humans successfully, then such a clause would be
required to stop people leaving and taking the secrets with them.
Alan.
--
To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'.

  #5  
Old November 7th 06, 06:20 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Tommo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,972
Default Future employment restriction in job contract


Marco wrote:
My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted
(the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the
company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months
afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable?


Perhaps. Such clauses are not uncommon, but it is a question for the
Courts whether they are enforceable.

There are a variety of considerations that are taken in to account when
deciding whether such a term is enforceable. These include, for
example, the nature of her job; her seniority; how close her
relationship is with the businesses customers; what, if any,
geographical restrictions are included in the clause.

Without further details about her job, the nature of the business and
so on it is impossible to give anything other than an equivocal answer.


  #6  
Old November 7th 06, 07:20 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
ChrisR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 143
Default Future employment restriction in job contract


"Alex Heney" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:20:06 +0000, "Marco"
wrote:

My wife's employment contract has a clause which can be interpreted
(the wording is not very clear) as saying that if she leaves the
company she cannot work for a competing firm for a period of six months
afterwards. Would such a clause be legally enforceable?


Probably.

We would have to see the clause, and it would depend on the exact
circumstances. It is by no means certain.

But in principle, such clauses are legal provided they are not of too
long a duration.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Earth is 98% full... please delete anyone you can.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom

Six months is the outside limit of what might be enforceable in most cases -
I certainly wouldn't say it's "probably" enforceable. And if the wording
isn't clear that will certainly count against the employer. In principle
such clauses are void unless reasonable to protect legitimate interests of
the employer.

Chris R



  #7  
Old November 7th 06, 08:40 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
salesguy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Future employment restriction in job contract




As it's a contract of employment, when your employment ends, doesn't the
contract too! Just wondered like...
And in any case, what would/could happen? They sue you for damages of some
kind?


They would issue an injunction against the company you were going to work
for, and threaten to claim damages from them.

I have done this in the past with an employee who tried to ignore the
provisions of his contract - it worked & protected the business for 3
months.


SalesGuy



  #8  
Old November 7th 06, 09:35 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Tommo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,972
Default Future employment restriction in job contract


Mike wrote:


As it's a contract of employment, when your employment ends, doesn't the
contract too! Just wondered like...
And in any case, what would/could happen? They sue you for damages of some kind?


Their primary remedy that they would seek would probably be an
injunction, but damages also.


  #9  
Old November 7th 06, 10:05 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Colin Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,025
Default Future employment restriction in job contract

The courts are generally unwilling to enforce clauses restricting
employees' ability to change employment.
Six months *anywhere* is probably too wide-ranging to be enforceable;
six months *within 20 miles* is probably enforceable - depending on
where you are, if you only have one major town within 20 miles it might
still be too restrictive.


IANAL and just thinking out loud...

Should there not be some sort of remuneration agreement in such cases
for the interim period - without such, could a previous employment
contract be enforced ?

  #10  
Old November 7th 06, 10:20 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Tommo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,972
Default Future employment restriction in job contract


Colin Wilson wrote:
The courts are generally unwilling to enforce clauses restricting
employees' ability to change employment.
Six months *anywhere* is probably too wide-ranging to be enforceable;
six months *within 20 miles* is probably enforceable - depending on
where you are, if you only have one major town within 20 miles it might
still be too restrictive.


IANAL and just thinking out loud...


Should there not be some sort of remuneration agreement in such cases
for the interim period - without such, could a previous employment
contract be enforced ?


The short answer is yes, it is possible to enforce these clauses
without payment in the meantime. However, they can be tricky to
enforce. If you really want to stop someone working the better option
is to put them on garden leave, in which case you do still have to pay
them.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Legal Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Myspace Proxy - Furniture Rebate - Secured Credit Cards - Buy Anything On eBay