![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 09:25:05 +0000, Dave N wrote:
In message , PCPaul writes On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:30:06 +0000, Michael Hoffman wrote: Dave N wrote: In message , Dave N writes I sent them an email earlier as well. Hopefully we'll get replies. I've just received this reply from the Statutory Publications Office:- "Thank you for advising us of this error. We have amended the document and will republish it to the Statute Law Database website, the corrected document should be available for viewing early next week." Good on you for getting this fixed. Yay! Usenet made a difference... I'd rather think that 'neverwas' made a difference. Well, it was actually you who first mentioned the actual omission.. being modest? So neverwas *and* Dave N made a difference, possibly also several lurkers and I would also have emailed them if it hadn't already been done. So, overall, a difference was made. Let's leave it at that. |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:15:08 +0000, "neverwas" wrote:
I've just received this reply from the Statutory Publications Office:- Me too. I take it the reply to you also had: "I apologise for any inconvenience this has caused. " and asked for a read receipt. I *do* like a bit of old-style civil service desire to round off the file with an acknowledgement. I am currently having a disagreement with Tesco Pet Insurance. I escalated the complaint and the acknowledgment closed with: "I would also like to thank you for allowing me the opportunity to address your concerns" Which I think is totally inappropriate - and particularly in light of the fact that they have not addressed them at all. (Cat put to sleep on January 7th. Last payment taken by DD on January 7th. Told Tesco Pet Insurance on January 9th. They insist that I have to pay for the period January 7th until February 6th; when I asked what eventualities they were insuring the dead cat against for this period they could not say. I have no problem paying for the extra couple of days - but I certainly object to a full month. They are still looking through the Ts&Cs so that they can show me where this cancellation policy is defined !!) (I resisted saying the cat is dead, it is not resting, it is deceased, it is demised, it is an ex-cat etc etc as I was quite upset at the time) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|