![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am getting married next month and will be taking my Husband's name.
My children both have their father's name (my ex husband)which I would like them to keep. Will it cause problems travelling with children with a different surname to me on the passport? If so, is there any way around this ie hyphonating the name so they have my surname and their father's surname? What are the legal implications and would I need their father's permission? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message
, at 09:10:04 on Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Squeaks remarked: I am getting married next month and will be taking my Husband's name. My children both have their father's name (my ex husband)which I would like them to keep. Will it cause problems travelling with children with a different surname to me on the passport? If so, is there any way around this ie hyphonating the name so they have my surname and their father's surname? What are the legal implications and would I need their father's permission? Children travelling on a parent's passport is a somewhat out of date concept, they should have their own. -- Roland Perry |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Squeaks" wrote in message ... I am getting married next month and will be taking my Husband's name. My children both have their father's name (my ex husband)which I would like them to keep. Will it cause problems travelling with children with a different surname to me on the passport? If so, is there any way around this ie hyphonating the name so they have my surname and their father's surname? What are the legal implications and would I need their father's permission? Yes, you must get written consent in case you are challenged... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 11, 10:40*am, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 09:10:04 on Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Squeaks remarked: I am getting married next month and will be taking my Husband's name. My children both have their father's name (my ex husband)which I would like them to keep. Will it cause problems travelling with children with a different surname to me on the passport? If so, is there any way around this ie hyphonating the name so they have my surname and their father's surname? What are the legal implications and would I need their father's permission? Children travelling on a parent's passport is a somewhat out of date concept, they should have their own. -- Roland Perry They do have their own passports, but their names will be different to mine, so as far as the authorities are concerned, I could be leaving the Country with anyone's kids. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 11, 9:10*am, Squeaks wrote:
I am getting married next month and will be taking my Husband's name. My children both have their father's name (my ex husband)which I would like them to keep. Will it cause problems travelling with children with a different surname to me on the passport? If so, is there any way around this ie hyphonating the name so they have my surname and their father's surname? What are the legal implications and would I need their father's permission? You don't put children on your passport any more, they have their own. but to answer the question from my own experience: yes it migth cause a minor difficulty. My wife kept using her maiden name after we married, but our (2 year old) daughter has my surname. This means that their two passports have different surnames and no obvious link. She was stopped entering the UK by the iimmigration official who, quite reasonably, wanted an explanation of how the child was connected to her. The simplest solution seems to be to carry the marriage certificate or child's birth certificate so that a link can be established between the two surnames. Robert |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:20:14 +0000, RobertL
wrote: My wife kept using her maiden name after we married, but our (2 year old) daughter has my surname. This means that their two passports have different surnames and no obvious link. She was stopped entering the UK by the iimmigration official who, quite reasonably, wanted an explanation of how the child was connected to her. I'm not at all sure that this behaviour by the immigration official was reasonable. It's not uncommon nowadays for a married woman to choose to keep her own name and for children to be given one or other of the parents' names. My experience is that this practice is becoming more widespread. Thus it's likely that an increasing number of mothers/fathers/children will have different names. Mike. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 11, 12:45*pm, Mike wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:20:14 +0000, RobertL wrote: My wife kept using her maiden name after we married, but our (2 year old) daughter has my surname. *This means that their two passports have different surnames and no obvious link. *She was stopped entering the UK by the iimmigration official who, quite reasonably, wanted an explanation of how the child was connected to her. I'm not at all sure that this behaviour by the immigration official was reasonable. *It's not uncommon nowadays for a married woman to choose to keep her own name and for children to be given one or other of the parents' names. *My experience is that this practice is becoming more widespread. *Thus it's likely that an increasing number of mothers/fathers/children will have different names. Mike. But if the immigration officials let people through with children with different names, anyone could therefore take your child and leave the country. It is common that people have different names to their children, but so is the trafficking of children, therefore the immigration official was doing his/her job properly. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 11, 12:45*pm, Mike wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:20:14 +0000, RobertL wrote: My wife kept using her maiden name after we married, but our (2 year old) daughter has my surname. *This means that their two passports have different surnames and no obvious link. *She was stopped entering the UK by the iimmigration official who, quite reasonably, wanted an explanation of how the child was connected to her. I'm not at all sure that this behaviour by the immigration official was reasonable. *It's not uncommon nowadays for a married woman to choose to keep her own name and for children to be given one or other of the parents' names. *My experience is that this practice is becoming more widespread. *Thus it's likely that an increasing number of mothers/fathers/children will have different names. Mike. Do I need the fathers consent to hyphernate the surname? Is this done by Deed poll? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message
, at 10:20:14 on Mon, 11 Feb 2008, RobertL remarked: The simplest solution seems to be to carry the marriage certificate or child's birth certificate so that a link can be established between the two surnames. That'll be one of those modern birth certificates that say at the bottom "this is not proof of identity", I suppose?? -- Roland Perry |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message
, at 12:15:07 on Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Squeaks remarked: But if the immigration officials let people through with children with different names, anyone could therefore take your child and leave the country. It is common that people have different names to their children, but so is the trafficking of children, therefore the immigration official was doing his/her job properly. When they introduced separate UK passports for children the main risk they *claimed* to be averting was the abduction of children by one parent, without the permission of the other. They seemed to believe that the parent with custody would keep the childrens' passports in a safe place, so if the other (estranged) parent wanted to run away with the children, they could not be taken overseas[1] as a result of having an entry in that estranged parent's passport. If that is their threat model, then having paperwork that proves that the estranged parent is a true parent of the children, doesn't help *at all*. Meanwhile, it is my understanding that passports for children under 15 [cite required] have to be signed by a parent (not the child). That's a quick way to ensure that the parent and child are "connected", especially if the parent with custody ensures they are the one who signed. The absence of an official scheme to link passports of one individual to another (eg parent/child)[2] says to me that there's no perceived need for such a thing. [1] Which of course begs the question of how many such 'abductions' involve overseas trips. [2] Which would be trivially easy because passport applications for children have to quote the parent's passport number. -- Roland Perry |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|