A UK legal issues forum. Legal Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Legal Banter forum » Legal Newsgroups » uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden.

Named as executor - right to refuse



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 8th 08, 07:45 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Traveller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Named as executor - right to refuse

I'm currently studying law (I know, may the gods help me..) and because of
this, plus a perception that I'm an efficient administrator (how easy it is
to deceive...) I'm told that I've been named as the executor for a
relative's estate when they pass on.

I *suppose* I'm willing to undertake this task, but it raises some questions
that my studies haven't brought me to yet:

- does a testator have to seek the consent of those he names as executors?
- if so, how should this consent be given?
- if no consent is sought or needed, can a person named as executor refuse
the task? Does it make any difference if they find out about it before or
after the death of a testator?
- I know an executor can claim reasonable expenses incurred in performance
of his duties; can he also claim lost wages/revenue if he is self-employed?

Don't wish to sound curmudgeonly, and hope that this task is many many years
away yet - just like to know where I stand...

Ta

T


  #2  
Old March 8th 08, 09:05 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Peter Crosland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,084
Default Named as executor - right to refuse

Traveller wrote:
I'm currently studying law (I know, may the gods help me..) and
because of this, plus a perception that I'm an efficient
administrator (how easy it is to deceive...) I'm told that I've been
named as the executor for a relative's estate when they pass on.

I *suppose* I'm willing to undertake this task, but it raises some
questions that my studies haven't brought me to yet:

- does a testator have to seek the consent of those he names as
executors?


No but it is common courtesy, and good manners to do so.

- if so, how should this consent be given?


There is no need for formality as the naming in the will is sufficient.

- if no consent is sought or needed, can a person named as executor
refuse the task?


The person can of course refuse and if named executor in the will can resign
provided they do so before taking any steps to administer the estate.

Does it make any difference if they find out about
it before or after the death of a testator?


See above. If they find out they have been named as executor before the
testaor's death .and don't want to act the correct thing to do would be to
tell the testator as soon as possible.

- I know an executor can claim reasonable expenses incurred in
performance of his duties; can he also claim lost wages/revenue if he
is self-employed?


Probably not unless there is a clause in the will allowing them to do so.

Don't wish to sound curmudgeonly, and hope that this task is many
many years away yet - just like to know where I stand...


Peter Crosland





  #3  
Old March 9th 08, 12:40 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Traveller[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default Named as executor - right to refuse

"Peter Crosland" wrote in message
...
[many helpful things]

Peter: Thank you for your clear and concise advice - much appreciated


  #4  
Old March 9th 08, 04:05 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Old Codger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 786
Default Named as executor - right to refuse

Traveller wrote:

- I know an executor can claim reasonable expenses incurred in
performance of his duties; can he also claim lost wages/revenue if he is
self-employed?


Doubt that but, if one is self employed, one will have an hourly rate.
I would have thought reasonable expenses would have included the costs
for both (reasonable) time and materials.

Not a lawyer however.


--
Old Codger
e-mail use reply to field

What matters in politics is not what happens, but what you can make
people believe has happened. [Janet Daley 27/8/2003]

  #5  
Old March 9th 08, 05:20 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Peter Crosland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,084
Default Named as executor - right to refuse

Old Codger wrote:
Traveller wrote:

- I know an executor can claim reasonable expenses incurred in
performance of his duties; can he also claim lost wages/revenue if
he is self-employed?


Doubt that but, if one is self employed, one will have an hourly rate.
I would have thought reasonable expenses would have included the costs
for both (reasonable) time and materials.


There is a very real distinction between out of pocket expenses genuinely
incurred and charging a fee. When a solicitor is appointed executor in a
will it is normal to state that his professional fees will be paid from the
estate. If this is not done then he would not be able to charge the estate.


Peter Crosland





  #6  
Old March 9th 08, 08:50 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Old Codger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 786
Default Named as executor - right to refuse

Peter Crosland wrote:
Old Codger wrote:
Traveller wrote:
- I know an executor can claim reasonable expenses incurred in
performance of his duties; can he also claim lost wages/revenue if
he is self-employed?

Doubt that but, if one is self employed, one will have an hourly rate.
I would have thought reasonable expenses would have included the costs
for both (reasonable) time and materials.


There is a very real distinction between out of pocket expenses genuinely
incurred and charging a fee. When a solicitor is appointed executor in a
will it is normal to state that his professional fees will be paid from the
estate. If this is not done then he would not be able to charge the estate.


Ah, thanks Peter.


--
Old Codger
e-mail use reply to field

What matters in politics is not what happens, but what you can make
people believe has happened. [Janet Daley 27/8/2003]

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Legal Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Sokmotoroptimering - Free Advertising - Mortgage Calculator - Debt Consolidation - Loans