A UK legal issues forum. Legal Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Legal Banter forum » Legal Newsgroups » uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden.

Tags: , , , ,

Would a class action deter F4J?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 24th 08, 10:15 AM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Big Les Wade[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 720
Default Would a class action deter F4J?

Richard Miller posted

I also know that in the case of most of the F4J people, the Courts were
100% justified in their actions. And that in the vast majority of
cases, the claim that this happens is not true. It used to be true in
too many cases that orders were not enforced as well as they should be,
but in the last three or four years, attitudes have changed significantly.


All pure assertion. Prove it.


--
Les
"God will save her, fear you not, be you the men you've been.
Get you the sons your fathers got and God will save the Queen."

  #22  
Old August 24th 08, 12:25 PM posted to uk.legal.moderated
Richard Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,136
Default Would a class action deter F4J?

In message , Big Les Wade
writes
Richard Miller posted

I also know that in the case of most of the F4J people, the Courts
were 100% justified in their actions. And that in the vast majority of
cases, the claim that this happens is not true. It used to be true in
too many cases that orders were not enforced as well as they should
be, but in the last three or four years, attitudes have changed significantly.


All pure assertion. Prove it.


Not pure assertion. Experience and knowledge based on the fact that I
regularly speak to family lawyers from all over the country. That,
however, is probably not proof that you will accept, and since the
Government decided not to remove the strict confidentiality attached to
family Courts, I can't give you anything more.
--
Richard Miller

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Legal Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
The Latest Gadgets - Online Advertising - Personal Injury Attorney Los Angeles - Remortgaging - Post ads for free forum