![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden. |
| Tags: after, bonus, employee, leaves, payment |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyone know how a case like this might get decided?
An employee is on a salary and bonus contact. The targets to get the bonus are subject to change at any time, at the employers whim. Employee is given a target, which they manage to meet enough to merit a particular payment. Employee then leaves the company. In the time between employee leaving and bonus payment date company changes the bonus targets such that employee no longer qualifies for as much payment. Is employee entitles to original or revised payment? One other complication - the time delay between leaving and payment means that the time limit for employment tribunal claims is over, is this likely to be a problem? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 11, 9:50 pm, PCPaul wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:30:08 +0100, Chris R wrote: , opined: Anyone know how a case like this might get decided? An employee is on a salary and bonus contact. The targets to get the bonus are subject to change at any time, at the employers whim. Employee is given a target, which they manage to meet enough to merit a particular payment. Employee then leaves the company. In the time between employee leaving and bonus payment date company changes the bonus targets such that employee no longer qualifies for as much payment. Is employee entitles to original or revised payment? One other complication - the time delay between leaving and payment means that the time limit for employment tribunal claims is over, is this likely to be a problem? I'm not an employument expert, but it sounds like a breach of the duty of trust and confidence between employer and employee. If the tribunal limit has passed you may need to claim in the County Court - but does the tribunal time limit apply to cliams for unlaful deduction of wages? The bonus scheme my company runs explicitly says the bonus is entirely at their discretion. It also says you must be an employee on the nominated bonus payment date to get it at all - so in the above situation I'd expect, and get, nothing. If you had left the company before the bonus was paid, or would ordinarily have been paid, then I submit you will be due nothing. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you had left the company before the bonus was paid, or would
ordinarily have been paid, then I submit you will be due nothing. The previous two posters, I suspect, have no experience of big money bonuses. This may help: http://www.cityjobs.com/home/discretionary_bonuses.html In the particular instance I'm asking about this is a distraction because the bonus is part of the employment contract. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
bonuses. This may help:
http://www.cityjobs.com/home/discretionary_bonuses.html and also http://www.roydens.co.uk/content04.htm |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
lid wrote:
If you had left the company before the bonus was paid, or would ordinarily have been paid, then I submit you will be due nothing. The previous two posters, I suspect, have no experience of big money bonuses. This may help: http://www.cityjobs.com/home/discretionary_bonuses.html In the particular instance I'm asking about this is a distraction because the bonus is part of the employment contract. Exactly. It's purely a matter of contract law, for which we need to know exactly what the contract says about the payment of any bonus. If that just refers to some other policy document, then we need to know what that says exactly, and so on. However, it is wholly unreasonable that targets should have been set (where, and in what terms?) for the payment of a bonus then, when they have already been met, be revised so that the expected bonus is not paid. It's fundamental that the contract is what it was at the time the work was done and cannot be unilaterally revised to have retrospective effect. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|