![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden. |
| Tags: accounts, authorisations, card, continuous, credit |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
According to a recent article [1] in The Guardian, Nationwide's credit
card customers are all getting replacement cards with new account numbers, and customers who pay subscriptions with their cards ...will have to tell each of these companies their new number. They will also have to change details on any bank accounts used to pay credit card bills each month - including those with Nationwide's own FlexAccount. Nationwide says there will be a 45-day overlap between the two cards, so if a Comic Relief customer forgets to change payment details for a subscription, the request for authorisation will automatically divert to the new account number. But after this period, the Comic Relief account will be closed and any request for authorisation will be rejected. However, I'm under the impression that card issuers normally tell customers that closing an account does not block payees from using continuous authorisations in the future, and that they (the issuers) can still bill customers for such charges made to closed accounts. Is that last bit of information out of date now? Or is there an explanation for this discrepancy? [1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008...editcards.debt |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
However, I'm under the impression that card issuers normally tell
customers that closing an account does not block payees from using continuous authorisations in the future, and that they (the issuers) can still bill customers for such charges made to closed accounts. My card issuer gave me a new card number specifically because I told them an online retailer was likely to payment from the old card and that I hadn't authorised the payment. The retailer duly did as expected, and the transaction failed. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Adam Funk" wrote in message ... According to a recent article [1] in The Guardian, Nationwide's credit card customers are all getting replacement cards with new account numbers, and customers who pay subscriptions with their cards ...will have to tell each of these companies their new number. They will also have to change details on any bank accounts used to pay credit card bills each month - including those with Nationwide's own FlexAccount. Nationwide says there will be a 45-day overlap between the two cards, so if a Comic Relief customer forgets to change payment details for a subscription, the request for authorisation will automatically divert to the new account number. But after this period, the Comic Relief account will be closed and any request for authorisation will be rejected. However, I'm under the impression that card issuers normally tell customers that closing an account does not block payees from using continuous authorisations in the future, and that they (the issuers) can still bill customers for such charges made to closed accounts. Is that last bit of information out of date now? Or is there an explanation for this discrepancy? I have always paid my credit card bills with the reference (original card number) that was given when I first set up the account. Even though the card numbers have changed many times over the years, the money still finds its way through to my credit card company from my online bank account. Marcus |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|