|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.legal.moderated (Legal Topics Relevant To UK Law - Moderated) (uk.legal.moderated) To enable contributors who have genuine legal problems to ask for practical advice from other people (lawyers or laymen) who have had to deal with similar problems in the past. Advertising is forbidden. |
| Tags: baby |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
November 13th 08, 06:35 PM
posted to uk.legal.moderated
|
|||
|
|||
Baby P
As a matter of interest why can't the mother and her 32 year old boyfriend be named?
CJ 
|
|
#2
November 13th 08, 07:05 PM
posted to uk.legal.moderated
|
|||
|
|||
|
Baby P
"Colin Jackson" writes:
As a matter of interest why can't the mother and her 32 year old boyfriend be named? I guess because there are other children. Naming the mother and/or boyfriend would effectively identify them.
|
|
#3
November 13th 08, 07:15 PM
posted to uk.legal.moderated
|
|||
|
|||
|
Baby P
Paul Rudin wrote:
"Colin Jackson" writes: As a matter of interest why can't the mother and her 32 year old boyfriend be named? I guess because there are other children. Naming the mother and/or boyfriend would effectively identify them. Theres another one on the way apparently!
|
|
#4
November 13th 08, 08:45 PM
posted to uk.legal.moderated
|
|||
|
|||
|
Baby P
"Colin Jackson" gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying: As a matter of interest why can't the mother and her 32 year old boyfriend be named? It's been suggested elsewhere that it's because she's 17, so a minor.
|
|
#5
November 13th 08, 09:45 PM
posted to uk.legal.moderated
|
|||
|
|||
|
Baby P
Adrian wrote:
"Colin Jackson" gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: As a matter of interest why can't the mother and her 32 year old boyfriend be named? It's been suggested elsewhere that it's because she's 17, so a minor. Rather unlikely, since she's actually 27. David Cameron was mistaken. -- David
|
|
#6
November 13th 08, 10:00 PM
posted to uk.legal.moderated
|
|||
|
|||
|
Baby P
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:45:18 +0000, Adrian
wrote: "Colin Jackson" gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: As a matter of interest why can't the mother and her 32 year old boyfriend be named? It's been suggested elsewhere that it's because she's 17, so a minor. David Cameron said in the House of Commons that she is 17, but she isn't. She is 27, as most of today's newspapers pointed out. -- Don Aitken Mail to the From: address is not read. To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"
|
|
#7
November 13th 08, 10:00 PM
posted to uk.legal.moderated
|
|||
|
|||
|
Baby P
the Omrud gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying: As a matter of interest why can't the mother and her 32 year old boyfriend be named? It's been suggested elsewhere that it's because she's 17, so a minor. Rather unlikely, since she's actually 27. David Cameron was mistaken. I don't think David Cameron posts to uk.legal or wherever I read it, but...
|
|
#8
November 13th 08, 11:15 PM
posted to uk.legal.moderated
|
|||
|
|||
|
Baby P
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:45:18 +0000, Adrian
wrote: "Colin Jackson" gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: As a matter of interest why can't the mother and her 32 year old boyfriend be named? It's been suggested elsewhere that it's because she's 17, so a minor. But she is actually 27. As Paul says, it is almost certainly because of her other children. -- Alex Heney, Global Villager Shotgun wedding: a case of wife or death. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
